Monday, August 04, 2008

Issues in RAC with Wrong Listener Configuration

The one thing that frustrates me the most is the lack of clear communication. Without clarity in what is being transpired, it's impossible for the receiver to understand the meaning - not just the superficial content but the subtle undertones as well. And it fails to materialize a manageable goal. I could be rambling about humans, of course; but the issue in communication goes beyond - to the things we create - writings, books, articles, poems, software programs, whatever. Oh, did I mention software programs?

Well, in this case I am talking about the software programs we all live by - the Oracle database; more specifically the RAC. Recently we suffered an outage. The reason turned out to be a simple issue of human forgetfulness; but the frustrating part was the lack of communication from the CRS about the issue. So, here is how it went.

This is a three node RAC. We applied the RAC bundle patch in a rolling fashion. Node 3 was brought down, patch applied and was brought up - everything was hunky dorey.

Then node 2 was brought down, patch applied and was brought up; but here was a little problem - the VIP didn't come up. The VIP relocated to node 3. But all the 23 services defined on the node were online. Strange. We assumed the issue was with the bundle patch ina rolling manner; so we decided to go ahead and do the deed on node 1, the remaining one.

When node 1 was brought up, we saw the real issues. The VIP for node 1 came up on node 3 and none of the services were up on node 1. Worse, the services that were up on node 2 suddenly went offline.

A lot of frantic calls to Oracle Support, request for esaclation to duty manager followed, along with the customary yelling and sioghing by the customer. At the end of 2 hours and with a Sev 1 SR, we hadn't gone anywhere.

At this time I took an executive decision. I asked the DBA to issue an ALTER SYSTEM comamnd on node 2 to bring up the services manually, bypassing CRS.


All the services where up on the instance 2 at this time, confirmed by SHOW PARAMETER SERVICE_NAMES command; but they still showed up as OFFLINE in crs_stat command. That meant, the instance had no issue with the services; the CRS had.

Then we issued a lsnrctl reload command to relaod the listener (note, we didn't use CRS to manipulate the listener - a very important clue you will see why later). The listener started fine with all service names. So far so good. We tried a few connections from the client and they connected fine. We did the same for node 1 and it worked too.

So, at this time, we had the services all up and running; but CRS had no idea about them. That meant the service failover probably wouldn't occur.

Next, we reloacted the VIP using the crs_relocate command. Al the VIPs (of node 1 and node 2) came back to the respective nodes. That was strange as well. If there was an issue with VIPs related to the networking software or hardware, how could they come back?

All these time we analyzed all the logs - the css, crs, racg alogs along with the alert log of the CRS (this is 10.2; so we have the alert log for CRS as well). Nothing there to indicate why it happened. And that's the basis of my rambling about lack of communication.

So, as always we went through the changes in the last few weeks. One of the crucial changes was the introduction of local_listener and remote_listener parameters in init.ora. These parameters can be placed as absolute values - with the host name, ports, etc. - or as the TNS alias entries. We had chosen the latter. The local_listener parameter was ok; but the remote_listener was listener_xxx.

Here was the entry for listener_xxx on tnsnames.ora:

listeners_xxx = (address_list = (address = (protocol=tcp)(host=sxxx1)(port=1521)) (address = (protocol=tcp)(host=sxxx2)(port=1521)) (address = (protocol=tcp)(host=sxxx3)(port=1521)))

There is nothing wrong with the syntax; but note the host value; sxxx1, sxxx2 and sxxx3 are all staging servers; and this is a production cluster. The communication does not work between prod and staging. So, the remote listener parameter pointed to hosts that were not even reachable! By the way, the entries were correct in node 3.

This caused the services to fail when started. Well, then how come they came up fine with ALTER SYSTEM?

My guess is since the ALTER SYSTEM command didn't go through the listener, it was not affected. CRS, on the other hand, goes through the listener.

Fine; but how come my lsnrctl reload command work? Again, my guess is, that comamnd simply starts the listener; the remote listener parameter in the database doesn't affect it. Since the local_listener parameter was correct, the services were successfully registered.

What about the VIP? How did the relocate work? I can only guess, of course. The conjecture is that the VIP is forced to go to the preferred node unless there is some sort of hardware issue, which was not in our case. So the relocate worked.

Phew! all these due to the sloppy work by a DBA. While this was deplorable, the issue with human error will continue to exist. Typos and wrong copy-and-paste will happen, no matter how much severe we make the punishment. I strongly feel CRS should have pointed out this error somewhere. In all that gets spewn out on CRS and CSS logs, how much is actually decipherable? Almost 99% has no meaning attached to it, at least for mere mortals. The idea behind the alert log of the CRS was to show the customer relevant issues in a common log; but there was no indication of this issue.

See the point about communication?


dan said...

I am facing the same issue that my node1 is pointing to node2.
how did you resolve it?
please let me know.please paste the command which you used.


Arup Nanda said...

For daniesh -

I am sorry, I don't understand your question. The blog post describes the issue and the resolution. Which particular one are you referring to by "how did you resolve it"? And, similarly, for "please paste the command which you used", commands for which activity are you referring to?

Callum Patel said...

It’s the first time I have heard that in Macedonia, obits are an unusual observe. You have wonderfully written the post. I have liked your way of writing this. Thanks for sharing thi